CS 152: Project 6

Title image Project 6
Fall 2016

Project 6: Optimizing the Simulation

This is the second project on elephant population simulation. In the first project, you developed the overall simulation and used it to figure out a single parameter: the percentage of female elephants to dart each year. This week we're going to explore how to optimize one or more parameters of a simulation automatically. This will involve a little bit of restructuring of your elephant simulation code and then the development of an optimizer that will run the simulation many times in order to figure out parameters that best achieve a specific outcome.


  1. Create a new file called optimize.py. Have the file import the sys, elephant, and random packages. Then create a function called optimize with the following definition.
    # Executes a search to bring the result of the function optfunc to zero.
    # min: minimum parameter value to search
    # max: maximum parameter value to search
    # optfunc: function to optimize
    # parameters: optional parameter list to pass to optfunc
    # tolerance: how close to zero to get before terminating the search
    # maIterations: how many iterations to run before terminating the search
    # verbose: whether to print lots of information or not
    def optimize( min, max, optfunc, parameters = None, tolerance = 0.001, maxIterations = 20, verbose=False ):

    The optimize function is very similar to the binary search function you wrote in lab. Start by assigning to a variable done the value False. Then, start a loop while done is False.

    Inside the loop, first assign to testValue the average of max and min. This is not (should not be) an integer calculation. If verbose is True, print out testValue. Next, assign to result the return value of calling optfunc with testValue and parameters as the arguments. If verbose is True, print out the result value.

    Next, if the result is positive, assign to max the value of testValue. Else if the result is negative, assign to min the value of testValue. Else, assign to done the value True.

    If max - min is less than the tolerance value, then assign to done the value True.

    Decrement maxIterations. If maxIterations is less than or equal to zero, then set done to True.

    Outside the loop, return testValue.

    To test your optimize function, copy the following code and run optimize.py. As noted in the comments, try making tolerance smaller and see if it matches more digits in the target value.

    # a function that returns x - target
    def target(x, pars):
        return x - 0.73542618
    # Tests the binary search using a simple target function.
    # Try changing the tolerance to see how that affects the search.
    def testTarget():
        res = optimize( 0.0, 1.0, target, tolerance = 0.01, verbose=True)
        print res
    if __name__ == "__main__":
  2. The next step is to test the optimize function with your elephantSim function. Create a testEsim function (similar to testTarget above) that calls optimize with a min value of 0.0, a max value of 0.5, and passes it elephant.elephantSim as the target function. You probably want to set verbose=True as well. As with the testTarget function, assign the return value to a variable and then print the variable. At the bottom of your code, change testTarget() to testEsim() then run optimize.py. Does your optimize function find a value close to 0.43 for the percent darted?
  3. The next step is to automate the process of evaluating the effects of changing a simulation parameter across a range of values. This function will let us discover, for example, the effect on the dart percentage of changing the calfSurvival rate from 80% to 90% in steps of 1%. The function definition is given below.
    # Evaluates the effects of the selected parameter on the dart percentage
    # whichParameter: the index of the parameter to test
    # testmin: the minimum value to test
    # testmax: the maximum value to test
    # teststep: the step between parameter values to test
    # defaults: default parameters to use (default value of None)
    def evalParameterEffect( whichParameter, testmin, testmax, teststep, defaults=None, verbose=False ):
        # if defaults is None, assign to simParameters the result of calling elephant.defaultParameters.
        # else, assign to simParameters a copy of defaults  (e.g. simParameters = defaults[:]
        # create an empty list (e.g. results) to hold the results
        if verbose:
            print "Evaluating parameter %d from %.3f to %.3f with step %.3f" % (whichParameter, testmin, testmax, teststep)
        # assign to t the value testmin
        # while t is less than testmax
            # assign to the whichParameter element of simParameters (e.g. simParameters[whicParameter]) the value t
            # assign to percDart the result of calling optimize with the appropriate arguments, including simParameters
            # append to results the tuple (t, percDart)
            if verbose:
                print "%8.3f \t%8.3f" % (t, percDart)
            # increment t by the value teststep
        if verbose:
            print "Terminating"
        # return the list of results

    Test your evalParameterEffects function by modifying your top level code at the bottom of your file to be the following.

    if __name__ == "__main__":
        evalParameterEffect( elephant.IDXProbAdultSurvival, 0.98, 1.0, 0.001, verbose=True )

    What does this do? What should you expect the output to be?

  4. Your final task is to make the following evaluations, showing the effect on the dart percentage of the following parameter sweeps. Make a table or graph (or both) for each case. These five items should go in your writeup.
    1. Vary the adult survival probability from 0.98 to 1.0 in steps of 0.001.
    2. Vary the calf survival probability from 0.80 to 0.90 in steps of 0.01.
    3. Vary the senior survival probability from 0.1 to 0.5 in steps of 0.05.
    4. Vary the calving interval from 3.0 to 3.4 in steps of 0.05.
    5. Vary the carrying capacity from 3500 to 7000 in steps of 500.

    Your goal is to automate this process as much as possible. One option is to write a program that executes all of these in sequence and writes the results to a CSV file. Note that this option may take a while to test and debug. A second option is to make a program that runs only one of these at a time, but it lets you control it from the command line (specifying which parameter and the min/max/step). That is easier to debug, but you have to run it several times.

    It is probably a good idea to figure out how to write data out to a CSV file and use that capability here.

        fp = file( "filename here", "w") # open a file for writing
        fp.write( "write this string to the file\n")  # write a string to the file
        fp.close()  # close the file


Each assignment will have a set of suggested extensions. The required tasks constitute about 85% of the assignment, and if you do only the required tasks and do them well you will earn a B+. To earn a higher grade, you need to undertake one or more extensions. The difficulty and quality of the extension or extensions will determine your final grade for the assignment. One complex extension, done well, or 2-3 simple extensions are typical.

The following are a few suggestions on things you can do as extensions to this assignment. You are free to choose other extensions.

Write-up and Hand-in

Turn in your code by putting it into your private hand-in directory on the Courses server. All files should be organized in a folder titled "Project 6" and you should include only those files necessary to run the program. We will grade all files turned in, so please do not turn in old, non-working, versions of files.

Make a new wiki page for your assignment. Put the label cs152f16project6 in the label field on the bottom of the page. But give the page a meaningful title (e.g. Milo's project 6).

In general, your intended audience for your write-up is your peers not in the class. Your goal should be to be able to use it to explain to friends what you accomplished in this project and to give them a sense of how you did it. Follow the outline below.

Thanks to Cathy Collins for the project idea and documentation. The original project concept and idea came from Therese Donovan, University of Vermont.